Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729438›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2023

Association of Radiation and Procarbazine Dose With Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Yvonne M Geurts, Rebecca Shakir, Georgios Ntentas, Sander Roberti, Marianne C Aznar, Katinka M John, Johanna Ramroth, Cécile P M Janus, Augustinus D G Krol, Judith M Roesink and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Subsequent primary neoplasm risk among survivors of cancer in adolescence and young adulthood: a population-based study from Alberta, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: A review with special emphasis on India.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Yvonne M GeurtsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rebecca ShakirNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Georgios NtentasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sander RobertiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marianne C AznarDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katinka M JohnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johanna RamrothNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cécile P M JanusDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Augustinus D G KrolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Judith M RoesinkDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Richard W M van der MaazenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Josée M ZijlstraDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sarah C DarbyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Berthe M P AlemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David J CutterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael SchaapveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Oncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBCancer Center AmsterdamChurchill Hospital · GBErasmus MC · NLGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have higher rates of colorectal cancer, which may be associated with subdiaphragmatic radiation therapy and/or alkylating chemotherapy. Although radiation dose-response associations with breast, lung, stomach, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer after HL have been demonstrated, the association of radiation therapy with colorectal cancer remains unclear. Objective: To quantify the rate of colorectal cancer according to radiation dose to the large bowel and procarbazine dose among HL survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nested case-control study examined 5-year HL survivors at 5 hospital centers in the Netherlands. Participants had been diagnosed with HL in 1964 to 2000, when they were 15 to 50 years of age, and were followed for a median of approximately 26 years. Survivors of HL who developed colorectal cancer and survivors who were selected as controls were individually matched on sex, age at HL diagnosis, and date of HL diagnosis. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to October 2022. Exposures: Mean radiation doses to the large bowel were estimated by reconstructing individual radiation therapy treatments on representative computed tomography data sets. Main Outcomes and Measures: Excess rate ratios (ERRs) were modeled to evaluate the excess risk associated with each 1-gray increase in radiation dose, and potential effect modification by procarbazine was explored. Results: The study population included 316 participants (mean [SD] age at HL diagnosis, 33.0 [9.8] years; 221 [69.9%] men), 78 of whom were HL survivors who developed colorectal cancer (cases) and 238 who did not (controls). The median (IQR) interval between HL and colorectal cancer was 25.7 (18.2-31.6) years. Increased colorectal cancer rates were seen for patients who received subdiaphragmatic radiation therapy (rate ratio [RR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and those who received more than 8.4 g/m2 procarbazine (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0). Overall, colorectal cancer rate increased linearly with mean radiation dose to the whole large bowel and dose to the affected bowel segment. The association between radiation dose and colorectal cancer rate became stronger with increasing procarbazine dose: the ERR per gray to the whole bowel was 3.5% (95% CI, 0.4%-12.6%) for patients who did not receive procarbazine, and increased 1.2-fold (95% CI, 1.1-1.3) for each 1-g/m2 increase in procarbazine dose. Conclusions and Relevance: This nested case-control study of 5-year HL survivors found a dose-response association between radiation therapy and colorectal cancer risk, and modification of this association by procarbazine. These findings may enable individualized colorectal cancer risk estimations, identification of high-risk survivors for subsequent screening, and optimization of treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHodgkin DiseaseCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleProcarbazineSurvivorsProcarbazine

Identifiers

PMID36729438
PMCPMC9896374
OpenAlexW4318916937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.