Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729345›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2023

Audiologists' perceived value of ototoxicity management and barriers to implementation for at-risk cancer patients in VA: the OtoMIC survey.

Dawn Konrad-Martin, Rachel Polaski, J Riley DeBacker, Sarah M Theodoroff, Angela Garinis, Cecilia Lacey, Kirsten Johansson, Rosemarie Mannino, Trisha Milnes, Michelle Hungerford and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Trends in ototoxicity monitoring among cisplatin-treated patients with cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. What's New in Ototoxicity Management?Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn Konrad-MartinNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. dawn.martin@va.gov.
Rachel PolaskiNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
J Riley DeBackerNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Sarah M TheodoroffNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Angela GarinisNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Cecilia LaceyNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Kirsten JohanssonDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Rosemarie ManninoDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Trisha MilnesNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Michelle HungerfordNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Khaya D ClarkNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, P5-NCRAR, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
VA Portland Health Care System · USOregon Health & Science University · USCharlie Norwood VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Short-Term Institutional Research Training Grant (T35)T35DC008764 · NIDCD · PORTLAND VA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. · PI DAWN L KONRAD-MARTIN · 2007 to 2026
$485k
Physiological, Behavioral and Predictive Correlates of Ototoxicity in HumansI01RX003127 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KONRAD-MARTIN, DAWN L · 2020 to 2024
–
NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008764RRD VA I01 RX003127RRD VA I50 RX002361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlatinum-based chemotherapies used to treat many types of cancers are ototoxic. Ototoxicity management (OtoM) to mitigate the ototoxic outcomes of cancer survivors is recommended practice yet it is not a standard part of oncologic care. Although more than 10,000 patients each year are treated with platinum-based chemotherapies at the US Veterans Health Administration (VA), the current state of OtoM in VA is not well-defined. This study reports on a national survey of VA audiologists' perceptions regarding OtoM in cancer patients.

methodsA 26-item online survey was administered to VA audiologists and service chiefs across the VA's 18 regional systems of care. Descriptive statistics and deductive thematic analysis were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe 61 respondents included at least one from each VA region. All reported they felt some form of OtoM was necessary for at-risk cancer patients. A pre-treatment baseline, the ability to detect ototoxicity early, and management of ototoxic effects both during and after treatment were considered high value objectives of OtoM by respondents. Roughly half reported routinely providing these services for patients receiving cisplatin and carboplatin. Respondents disagreed regarding appropriate hearing testing schedules and how to co-manage OtoM responsibilities with oncology. They identified barriers to care that conformed to three themes: care and referral coordination with oncology, audiology workload, and lack of protocols.

conclusionsAlthough VA audiologists value providing OtoM for cancer patients, only about half perform OtoM for highly ototoxic treatment regimens. The OtoMIC survey provides clinician perspectives to benchmark and address OtoM care gaps. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Collaboration between oncology and audiology is needed to improve current OtoM processes, so that cancer survivors can have more control over their long term hearing health.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHearing LossNeoplasmsOtotoxicityAudiologistsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesDrug monitoringDrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsHearing lossOtotoxicityProfessional practice gapsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36729345
PMCPMC9892665
OpenAlexW4318922246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.