Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2023
Evaluation of the Influence of Sildenafil on the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Vericiguat in Healthy Adults.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Narrative Review of Independent Treatment Methods for ED: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Diet, Supplements, Pharmacotherapy, and Physiotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Vericiguat.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Comment on: Evaluation of the Influence of Sildenafil on the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Vericiguat in Healthy Adults.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2023Article
- Authors' Reply to Ganijee et al.: "Comment on: Evaluation of the Influence of Sildenafil on Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Vericiguat in Healthy Adults".Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveVericiguat is approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure with ejection fraction < 45%. Sildenafil, indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, is a potential co-medication in male patients. This study investigated the safety and tolerability of co-administration of vericiguat and sildenafil in healthy volunteers.
methodsThis was a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 32 healthy white male volunteers. Participants received vericiguat 10 mg or placebo once daily for 16 days. Both groups received single doses of sildenafil (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) on days 13-15. Safety, hemodynamic changes, and pharmacokinetic effects were assessed.
resultsAll subjects in the vericiguat group and seven (43.8%) in the placebo group reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events, all of mild or moderate intensity. Decreases in seated blood pressure (≤ 5.4 mmHg) with the vericiguat-sildenafil combination compared with placebo-sildenafil were small and there was no evidence of a sildenafil dose-related effect. Standing blood pressure and standing and seated heart rate were similar between treatment groups. Co-administration of sildenafil did not affect vericiguat pharmacokinetics. A mild increase in sildenafil exposure (≤ 22%) when co-administered with vericiguat was observed.
conclusionsAdding single doses of sildenafil to vericiguat 10 mg once daily at steady state was well tolerated and produced a minimal reduction in seated blood pressure (≤ 5.4 mmHg) compared with administration of sildenafil alone. There was no effect of sildenafil on vericiguat pharmacokinetics, and an increase in sildenafil exposure with vericiguat co-administration was not clinically relevant. CLINICAL
trial registrationEudraCT no. 2015-004997-14.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.