Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729269›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2023

Clinical and organizational impact of the use of different cardiac troponin assays for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction without persistent elevation of the ST segment at presentation (NSTEMI) in 12 Italian emergency departments (EDs): the TROCAR study.

Laura Camoni, Maria Elena Tosti, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Marco Marchetti, Chiara Cadeddu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura CamoniCentre for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. laura.camoni@iss.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9007-6479
Maria Elena TostiNational Centre for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Angelo Maria PezzulloSection of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco MarchettiNational Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CadedduSection of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of acute chest pain is one of the challenges for emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. This study aims to provide insights into clinical and organizational aspects related to the use of different cardiac troponin tests for the diagnosis of NSTEMI. A prospective observational study was conducted among 12 Italian EDs. Eligible participants had chest pain of suspected cardiac origin and accessed EDs from January 2017 to March 2019. A 30-day follow-up was performed to gather information about the main cardiac outcomes. Tests validity and performance were assessed by computing sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the ROC curve. The independent association between adverse event end point at 30 days and type of troponin was evaluated by multiple logistic regression models, using odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. 2913 patients were included. Almost 72% were affected by comorbidities and most of them stayed in the EDs for more than 3 h, with significant differences among the different troponin assays. The results of follow-up at 30 days for the outcomes considered for the patients who were ruled out in 3 h or less did not differ significantly compared to those ruled out after 3 h or more. After adjustment for confounders, patients admitted to an ED that used a high-sensitivity troponin were at a lower risk of having a MACE (OR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.35-0.90) and a non-significant lower risk of myocardial infarction (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.13, p = 0.1314) at 30 days compared to patients admitted to an ED that used a standard troponin. Appropriate troponin testing is extremely important for differential diagnosis and for addressing proper treatment and safe procedures for patients who are not admitted to the hospital.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionBiomarkersChest PainEmergency Service, HospitalHumansSensitivity and SpecificityTroponinBiomarkersTroponinAcute chest painAcute coronary syndromeClinical practiceDifferential diagnosisHigh-sensitivity assaysMyocardial injury

Identifiers

PMID36729269
PMCPMC9894517
OpenAlexW4318912766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.