ArticleLasers in medical science2023
Low-power laser in increasing doses improve wound healing process in rats.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-power laser has been studied and applied as an auxiliary tool in wound healing. However, as it is a therapy with several variables to be controlled, there is great difficulty in establishing protocols and comparing its efficacy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the use of low-power laser in fixed and crescent doses in the healing of skin wounds in rats. Seventy-five male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: G1 with animals that did not receive laser radiation; G2 with animals treated with fixed dose of 3 J/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
36729262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.