Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729232›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Trends in emergency colorectal surgery: a 7-year retrospective single-centre cohort study.

Rachel Smyth, Alexander Darbyshire, Stuart Mercer, Jim Khan, John Richardson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early post-operative outcomes in adults undergoing minimally invasive versus open emergency colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  3. Surgical outcomes of curative intent management in emergency vs. elective colon cancer: A retrospective single center study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-malignant left colon emergency surgery: evaluation of factors affecting clinical outcomes and complications.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel SmythMRCS Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. rachelsmyth@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-3967
Alexander DarbyshireMRCS Upper GI Surgery, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Stuart MercerFRCS Upper GI Surgery, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Jim KhanFRCS Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
John RichardsonFRCS Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency colorectal resections carry a higher morbidity and mortality than elective surgery. The use of minimally invasive surgery has now become widespread in elective colorectal surgery, with improved patient outcomes. Laparoscopy is being increasingly used for emergency colorectal resections, but its role is still being defined. Our aim was to observe the uptake of laparoscopy for emergency colorectal surgery in our centre.

methodA retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed using local National Emergency Laparotomy Audit data from January 2014-December 2020. All patients who had a colorectal resection were included. Trends in the number and type of resections were recorded. Primary outcome was the proportion of cases started and completed laparoscopically. Secondary outcomes included rate of conversion to open, length of stay and 30-day mortality.

resultsA total 523 colorectal resections were performed. The number of cases attempted and completed laparoscopically steadily increased over the study period (28.3% to 63.3% and 16.3% to 35.4%, respectively). The mean rate of conversion to open was 43.8%. The greatest expansion in laparoscopy was for cases of intestinal obstruction, perforation and peritonitis, and for those undergoing Hartmann's procedure and right hemicolectomy. 30‑day mortality for cases completed laparoscopically was much lower than those converted or started with open surgery (2.1% vs 11.7% and 17.5%, respectively). Laparoscopic approach was independently associated with reduced length of stay.

conclusionLaparoscopy has been successfully adopted for emergency colorectal resections in our centre, with half of cases felt to be suitable for minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryLaparoscopyCohort StudiesColectomyHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEmergency colorectal surgeryLaparoscopyTrends in surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.