ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Artificial intelligence in urology-opportunities and possibilities].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Between catheters and artificial intelligence: High-tech urology-where manual skills meet digital expertise].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Clinical reasoning with machines: evaluating the interpretive depth of AI in urological case assessments.BMC urology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in urology can contribute to a significant improvement with regard to individualization of diagnostics and therapy as well as healthcare cost reduction. The potential applications and advantages of AI in medicine are often underestimated or incompletely understood. This makes it difficult to conceptually solve relevant medical problems using AI. With current advances in computer science, multiple, highly complex nonmedical processes have already been studied and optimized in an automated fashion. The development of AI models, if applied correctly, can lead to more effective processing and analysis of patient-related data and correspondingly optimized diagnosis and therapy of urological patients. In this review, the current status on the application of AI in medicine and its opportunities and possibilities in urology are presented from a conceptual perspective using practical examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.