Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729173›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2023

Implementation of artificial intelligence in thoracic imaging-a what, how, and why guide from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI).

Fergus Gleeson, Marie-Pierre Revel, Jürgen Biederer, Anna Rita Larici, Katharina Martini, Thomas Frauenfelder, Nicholas Screaton, Helmut Prosch, Annemiek Snoeckx, Nicola Sverzellati and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis.European radiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Innovations in Chest Imaging: How Can Patients Benefit?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fergus GleesonDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marie-Pierre RevelDepartment of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jürgen BiedererDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna Rita LariciDepartment of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Katharina MartiniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Unversity Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas FrauenfelderInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Unversity Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicholas ScreatonDepartment of Radiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Helmut ProschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Annemiek SnoeckxDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Nicola SverzellatiScienze Radiologiche, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Benoit GhayeDepartment of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anagha P ParkarDepartment of Radiology, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway. apparkar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-3446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This statement from the European Society of Thoracic imaging (ESTI) explains and summarises the essentials for understanding and implementing Artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice in thoracic radiology departments. This document discusses the current AI scientific evidence in thoracic imaging, its potential clinical utility, implementation and costs, training requirements and validation, its' effect on the training of new radiologists, post-implementation issues, and medico-legal and ethical issues. All these issues have to be addressed and overcome, for AI to become implemented clinically in thoracic radiology. KEY POINTS: • Assessing the datasets used for training and validation of the AI system is essential. • A departmental strategy and business plan which includes continuing quality assurance of AI system and a sustainable financial plan is important for successful implementation. • Awareness of the negative effect on training of new radiologists is vital.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyHumansRadiography, ThoracicRadiologistsSocieties, MedicalArtificial intelligenceDiagnosis, Computer assistedThorax

Identifiers

PMID36729173
PMCPMC9892666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.