Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729145›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2023

Reconsidering "dissociation" as a predictor of antidepressant efficacy for esketamine.

David S Mathai, Sandeep M Nayak, David B Yaden, Albert Garcia-Romeu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ketamine reduces the neural distinction between self- and other-produced affective touch: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advancing past ketamine: emerging glutamatergic compounds for the treatment of depression.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Esketamine use in real-world clinical practice in patients with treatment-resistant depression.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ketamine, Dissociation, and Depression: What Is "Special" About Ketamine? (Revisited).The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David S MathaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. d.s.mathai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-601X
Sandeep M NayakDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
David B YadenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Albert Garcia-RomeuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe relationship between subjective drug experience and antidepressant outcomes for ketamine derivatives is poorly understood but of high clinical relevance. Esketamine is the patented (S)-enantiomer of ketamine and has regulatory approval for psychiatric applications.

objectivesWe examined the relationship between acute dissociation, as measured by the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), and antidepressant efficacy, as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), for esketamine across the 4-week induction phase of treatment.

methodsThis post hoc analysis combined data (N = 576) from the TRANSFORM-1 and TRANSFORM-2 clinical trials of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Linear mixed models were performed using total MADRS score as the outcome variable with the following independent variables: baseline MADRS score, treatment condition × time interaction, and CADSS × time interaction. To assess whether initial dissociation predicted rapid antidepressant benefit with esketamine, a separately planned regression was performed with day 2 MADRS as the outcome variable with the following dependent variables: baseline MADRS, treatment condition, and day 1 CADSS.

resultsThe linear mixed model did not show any effect of a CADSS × time interaction (p = 0.7). Looking solely at the effect of day 1 CADSS on day 2 MADRS revealed that each additional CADSS point was associated with a - .04 [95% CI - .08, - .002] (p = .04) decrease in MADRS score.

conclusionsWe found no evidence of a clinically significant positive or negative association between dissociation and antidepressant effect for esketamine. Our findings suggest that subsequent inquiry in this area will benefit from improved characterization of drug experiences relevant to therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantKetamineAdministration, IntranasalAntidepressive AgentsDouble-Blind MethodHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsEsketamineKetamineDepressionDissociationEsketamineKetaminePhenomenologyPsychedelicSubjectiveTrance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.