Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36728340›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2023

Real-world evaluation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

Xavier Montalban, Paul M Matthews, Alex Simpson, John L Petrie, Cormac Sammon, Sreeram Ramagopalan, Giulio Disanto, Jens Kuhle

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ocrelizumab use in multiple sclerosis: a real-world experience in a changing therapeutic scenario.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xavier MontalbanDepartment of Neurology, Centre d'Esclerosi Mútiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Barcelona, Spain.
Paul M MatthewsDepartment of Brain Sciences, UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alex SimpsonF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Global Access, Basel, Switzerland.
John L PetriePHMR Ltd, Berkley Grove, London, UK.
Cormac SammonPHMR Ltd, Berkley Grove, London, UK.
Sreeram RamagopalanF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Global Access, Basel, Switzerland.
Giulio DisantoEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland.
Jens KuhleDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de CatalunyaEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHImperial College London · GBUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across its clinical development program, ocrelizumab demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis, including annualized relapse rates and confirmed disability progression. However, as with any new treatment, it was unclear how this efficacy would translate into real-world clinical practice. The objective of this study was to systematically collate the published real-world clinical effectiveness data for ocrelizumab in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and primary progressive multiple sclerosis. A search strategy was developed in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles reporting real-world evidence in people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or primary progressive multiple sclerosis receiving treatment with ocrelizumab. The search focused on English language articles only but was not limited by the country in which the study was conducted or the time frame of the study. Additional manual searches of relevant websites were also performed. Fifty-two studies were identified reporting relevant evidence. Real-world effectiveness data for ocrelizumab were consistently favorable, with reductions in relapse rate and disease progression rates similar to those reported in the OPERA I/OPERA II and ORATORIO clinical trials, including in studies with more diverse patient populations not well represented in the pivotal trials. Although direct comparisons are confounded by lack of randomization of treatments, outcomes reported suggest that ocrelizumab has a similar or greater efficacy than other therapy options. Initial real-world effectiveness data for ocrelizumab appear favorable and consistent with results reported in clinical trials, providing clinicians with an efficacious option to treat patients with multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansImmunologic FactorsRecurrenceAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunologic Factorsocrelizumab

Identifiers

PMID36728340
PMCPMC10014013
OpenAlexW4318912436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.