Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36727436›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Structural predictions of protein-DNA binding: MELD-DNA.

Reza Esmaeeli, Antonio Bauzá, Alberto Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RNA sequence design and protein-DNA specificity prediction with NA-MPNN.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MELD in Action: Harnessing Data to Accelerate Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reza EsmaeeliDepartment of Chemistry, Quantum theory project, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8679-4267
Antonio BauzáDepartment of Chemistry, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca (Baleares), 07122, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-781X
Alberto PerezDepartment of Chemistry, Quantum theory project, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-5338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural, regulatory and enzymatic proteins interact with DNA to maintain a healthy and functional genome. Yet, our structural understanding of how proteins interact with DNA is limited. We present MELD-DNA, a novel computational approach to predict the structures of protein-DNA complexes. The method combines molecular dynamics simulations with general knowledge or experimental information through Bayesian inference. The physical model is sensitive to sequence-dependent properties and conformational changes required for binding, while information accelerates sampling of bound conformations. MELD-DNA can: (i) sample multiple binding modes; (ii) identify the preferred binding mode from the ensembles; and (iii) provide qualitative binding preferences between DNA sequences. We first assess performance on a dataset of 15 protein-DNA complexes and compare it with state-of-the-art methodologies. Furthermore, for three selected complexes, we show sequence dependence effects of binding in MELD predictions. We expect that the results presented herein, together with the freely available software, will impact structural biology (by complementing DNA structural databases) and molecular recognition (by bringing new insights into aspects governing protein-DNA interactions).

Indexed as

DNADNA-Binding ProteinsSoftwareBayes TheoremComputational BiologyProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36727436
PMCPMC9976882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.