Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36727019›Full record

ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2022

Liquid Biopsy for Guiding Treatment Decisions in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Gretchen Suk

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gretchen SukGuardant Health, Inc., Palo Alto, California, and University of Lynchburg, Lynchburg, Virginia.
University of Lynchburg · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. The 5-year survival rates are poor with traditional therapy alone. New scientific advances in technology involving the human genome, including diagnostic tools to inform on tumor-derived acquired (somatic) mutations that drive cancer formation, are essential to utilize. Targeting cancer cells paired with actionable drugs to shut off growth pathways has significantly improved patient survival. Obtaining mutational analysis can be performed via traditional methods such as tissue; new advances allow comparable information obtained through liquid biopsy to inform targeted treatment decision-making. Getting tissue for additional molecular analysis can pose several challenges for patients. Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive test (typically blood) analyzed by next-generation sequencing for tumor shed to obtain actionable information for treatment decisions. Analyses between blood and tissue consistently yield high concordance, with liquid biopsy providing faster turnaround time for results than tissue. The utility of liquid biopsy is well proven but not standardized and cannot diagnose lung cancer histopathology, which requires a tissue diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID36727019
PMCPMC9881738
OpenAlexW3182694144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.