ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Initial clinical experiences of the muscle-preserving double door cervical laminoplasty with adjustable mini plates.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Changes of laminar angle in cervical double-door laminoplasty -comparison of conventional method and suture anchor method using computed tomography images- a pilot study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A rare presentation of osteochondroma at the spinous process of the cervical spine: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shirashi's double door laminoplasty method was a popular decompression procedure for cervical myelopathy. In this paper, we introduced a modified double door laminoplasty based on Shirashi's method with preliminary results. This study retrospectively analyzed 22 patients who underwent modified double door laminoplasty. During procedure, a single segment of the unilateral lamina was separated from the cervical semispinalis muscle and the multifidus muscle space for the preparation of lamina groove. A self-developed mini titanium plate was used to fix the inner side of the spinous process to complete the fixation after open-door process. The VAS, JOA scores and QoL scale were recorded for pain assessment, neurological and functional recovery. The overall curvature and range of motion of C2-C7 were measured with x-ray images. Changes in sagittal diameter of spinal canal were measured by CT scans. MRI was used to measure the cross-sectional area of cervical paravertebral muscles. All 22 patients successfully recovered with this procedure. The mean operation time, blood loss and follow-up durations were 117 ± 25 min, 149 ± 32 ml and 16.1 ± 3.6 months respectively. The preoperative, 3-month postoperative and 12-month postoperative JOA scores were 9.35 ± 3.25, 13.74 ± 4.86 and 15.73 ± 5.19 respectively. with improvement rates of 57.4% and 83.4%. Mean VAS scores before, 3 months after and 12 months after surgery were 1.81 ± 0.79, 2.82 ± 1.56 and 2.18 ± 1.34 respectively. The C2-7 lordotic angle and overall range of motion shows no statistical difference preoperatively and 12 post-surgery. The average sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal was enlarged from 9.15 ± 1.55 mm to 14.25 ± 1.46 mm. The average area of cervical paravertebral volume measured preoperatively and 3 months post operation was 84% of pre-operative value respectively. This value was improved to 93% of the preoperative value at 12 months post-surgery. This paper introduced initial experience on a modified posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty that was based on Shirashi's method, featuring creating bilateral laminar grooves on both sides and fixing central gap with self-developed mini plates. This procedure prevented obvious axial symptoms and improved patients' quality of life, which provided a baseline for further research with larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.