Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726858›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2023

Efficacy of Probiotics Compared to Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Improving Periodontal Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kaio Henrique Soares, Parsa Firoozi, Glaciele Maria de Souza, Olga Beatriz Lopes Martins, Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci, Cassio Roberto Rocha Dos Santos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Iranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaio Henrique SoaresDepartment of Dentistry, School of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória,N. 187 Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1239-9296
Parsa FirooziStudent Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-1485
Glaciele Maria de SouzaDepartment of Dentistry, School of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória,N. 187 Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-072X
Olga Beatriz Lopes MartinsDepartment of Dentistry, School of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória,N. 187 Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-1539
Saulo Gabriel Moreira FalciDepartment of Dentistry, School of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória,N. 187 Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-5199
Cassio Roberto Rocha Dos SantosDepartment of Dentistry, School of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória,N. 187 Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0435-5223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To critically evaluate the available literature and conduct a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials to assess the effectiveness of probiotics compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash in enhancing periodontal health. Methods: Five databases were searched electronically, as well as the gray literature. Using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials, the risk of bias was examined. The weighted mean difference (WMD) method was used to calculate the effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using Results: A total of 1850 studies were initially identified. Sixteen clinical trials were eligible for qualitative synthesis, and ten were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of the gingival index, in total, no statistically significant difference was observed between chlorhexidine and probiotics within 4 weeks (WMD -0.03, 95% CI: -0.09∼0.04, Conclusions: Based on the findings, probiotics were an acceptable alternative to conventional chlorhexidine in improving periodontal health. High-quality studies with rigorous methodology should be conducted to assess the optimum doses of probiotics for clinical implications.

Identifiers

PMID36726858
PMCPMC9886484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.