Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726839›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2023

The Effect of

Liangliang Yao, Xuan Zhang, Chaoming Huang, Yi Cai, Chunpeng Craig Wan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liangliang YaoAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8435-5954
Xuan ZhangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China.
Chaoming HuangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China.
Yi CaiGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-222X
Chunpeng Craig WanCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Post-Harvest Technology and Nondestructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang 330045, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-016X
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To screen the main active components of Methods: The active ingredients in Results: Five active ingredients of Conclusion:

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCitrusDrugs, Chinese HerbalLung NeoplasmsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Medicine, Chinese TraditionalMolecular Docking SimulationPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsDrugs, Chinese HerbalMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Identifiers

PMID36726839
PMCPMC9886468
OpenAlexW4317757206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.