ArticleApplied physics. A, Materials science & processing2021
On-chip ionic current sensor.
Article in Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Optimization Design of Microfluidic Chips Based on Fast Sequence Pair Algorithm.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural implants that deliver drugs or electrical stimuli via microfluidic ports are promising in providing therapy for various disorders such as epilepsy, chronic pain, and vestibular diseases. To deliver the stimuli to a neural target, these devices incorporate two or more electrodes that apply an electric field to drive charged particles or ions along an aqueous route provided by microfluidic channels. The amount of drug/current delivered is determined by measuring the ionic current flow. When the ionic current can only travel from one electrode to another via a single route or channel, the amount of therapeutic current is stoichiometrically equal to the electronic current applied by the device and therefore can be measured with an electronic current sensor. However, some recently developed devices contain networks of branched channels. In this case, the presence of multiple parallel ionic current paths makes it so that the current through any one individual channel is no longer measurable by observing electronic current alone. Here, we present an on-chip sensor that uses two Pt/Ir electrodes to transduce the ionic current through a target channel into a measurable voltage signal. The size of the metal wires did not impact the measured voltage, the size of the channel between the two sensing electrodes determines sensitivity of the sensor, change in temperature can cause a change in readings, and input impedance of the voltage measuring equipment must be greater than 1 GΩ to maintain measurement stability. The sensor showed stability of reading in a one-week longevity test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.