Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726726›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Relationship between the roots of

Lu Liu, Yuefeng Guo, Xiaoyu Liu, Yunfeng Yao, Wei Qi

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu LiuInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Yuefeng GuoInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaoyu LiuInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Yunfeng YaoInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Wei QiInner Mongolia Autonomous Region Water Conservancy Development Center, Hohhot, China.
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To solve the withering of Methods: We stumped aging Results: The root fractal features, root branching rate, root length, root soluble proteins, soil moisture content, and soil nutrients among the different treatments were ranked as S3>S2>S1>S4>CK (

Indexed as

HippophaeChinaForestsSoilTreesSoilFeldspathic sandstone areasHippophae rhamnoides rootRoot microenvironmentStump heightVegetation restoration

Identifiers

PMID36726726
PMCPMC9885864
OpenAlexW4318215106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.