Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726705›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2022

Development and Retention of Early-Career Clinician-Scientists through a Novel Peer Mentorship Program: Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Workgroup.

Elizabeth M Viglianti, Andrew J Admon, Erin F Carlton, Scott J Denstaedt, Thomas S Valley, Deena K Costa, Colin R Cooke, Robert Dickson, Theodore J Iwashyna, Hallie C Prescott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unleashing the Early Career Transition in Academic Medicine.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Implementation and Evaluation of a National Well-Being Curriculum for KL2 Scholars.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth M VigliantiDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-6322
Andrew J AdmonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-3764
Erin F CarltonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6206-0514
Scott J DenstaedtDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-5146
Thomas S ValleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-4970
Deena K CostaInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-5349
Colin R CookeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.
Robert DicksonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-4277
Theodore J IwashynaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.
Hallie C PrescottDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-6724

Funding

Preventing avoidable deaths from pneumonia by improving use of intensive careK23HL140165 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2018 to 2022
$915k
Predisposition for Lung Injury in Sepsis SurvivalK08HL153799 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DENSTAEDT, SCOTT JOHN · 2021 to 2025
$848k
Characterizing the Impact of Fragmented Care in Acute Respiratory FailureK08HL155407 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ADMON, ANDREW JOHN · 2021 to 2025
$848k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL153799NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL155407NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL140165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early-career clinician-scientists often leave academic medicine, but strong mentorship can help facilitate retention. Beyond the traditional dyadic mentor-mentee relationship, formal peer mentoring provides a rich means to augment career development and foster independence. Objective: To describe a model for early-career peer mentorship and the retention of participating early-career clinician-scientists in academic medicine. Methods: In 2015, a multidisciplinary and interprofessional group of early-career clinician-scientists focused on critical care developed a peer mentoring group at the University of Michigan called the MICReW (Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Workgroup). We describe the establishment, sustainability, guiding principles, challenges, and successes of MICReW. Results: MICReW was established to be a formal, peer-only mentoring group without the direct participation of senior mentors. The purpose of MICReW was to support and promote the research and career development of early-career clinician-scientists by creating an environment that fostered diverse opinions, constructive feedback, and camaraderie. As a group, we wrote a mission statement and defined our guiding principles. Our sustainability, growth, and adaptability (seamlessly transitioning to all virtual meetings) were possible by the continued investment of our peer members. To date, MICReW has had 30 members, of whom 15 are current members and approximately half are women. Nearly all members ( Conclusion: The MICReW peer mentorship model is a sustainable and adaptable peer mentoring model whose members continue to be engaged in academic medicine.

Indexed as

critical careearly-careermentorshippeer mentoring

Identifiers

PMID36726705
PMCPMC9886001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.