Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726655›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

Wet Laboratory Training in Ophthalmology as a Tool for Formative Assessment.

Purvi Raj Bhagat, Jignesh Jethva

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Purvi Raj BhagatDepartment of Glaucoma Clinic, M and J Western Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Jignesh JethvaDepartment of Glaucoma Clinic, M and J Western Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical skills training and assessment have always remained a critical issue for both trainees and trainers. Ophthalmology being a microsurgical specialty, its training in the operating theater further faces a lot of challenges. Wet laboratory training and simulation training were, therefore, developed so that residents acquired certain basic skills in controlled laboratory settings before they could operate on patients and patient safety could thereby be ensured. Unfortunately, most literature focuses on the benefits such practice has on operating room performance; but not much attention has been paid to the use of such training for formative assessment, feedback, and its importance in effective learning. In this article, we highlight the challenges faced in surgical skill transfer and also give an insight into how wet or dry laboratory training can be of formative value in postgraduate training.

Indexed as

Dry laboratoryformative assessmentrubricsimulationsurgical skillswet laboratory

Identifiers

PMID36726655
PMCPMC9886154
OpenAlexW4313208749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.