ArticleClinical kidney journal2023
Regional variation in tolvaptan prescribing across England: national data and retrospective evaluation from an expert centre.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Integrating Clinical Practice Guidelines, Patient Perspectives, and Real-World Effectiveness.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Review
- Tolvaptan in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD): a multicenter real life Italian experience.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Commentary: Tolvaptan for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) - an update.BMC nephrology · 2025Review
- Questioning the kidney-protective effects of tolvaptan: a testable hypothesis to revisit the current narrative.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Prospective Study on Individualized Dose Adjustment of Tolvaptan Based on Urinary Osmolality in Patients With ADPKD.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, was approved in 2015 by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for use in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and rapid disease progression. Simultaneous guidance was issued by the UK Kidney Association (UKKA) to facilitate national implementation. Methods: Data on tolvaptan prescribing in England was obtained through the National Health Service (NHS) Digital, a national survey of all 77 adult kidney units, and the implementation of UKKA guidance was evaluated at an expert PKD centre. Results: A regional variation of up to 4-fold for tolvaptan prescribing in England was found. Despite most kidney units following UKKA guidance, centre-based estimates of eligible or treated patient numbers were highly variable. Retrospective evaluation at an expert PKD centre revealed that in a cohort demonstrating rapid estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, 14% would not be eligible for tolvaptan by Mayo imaging classification and more than half (57%) would not be eligible by Predicting Renal Outcome in Polycystic Kidney Disease score. The 3-year discontinuation rate was higher than expected (56%), the majority (70%) due to aquaretic symptoms. In patients taking tolvaptan for at least 2 years, 81% showed a reduction in the rate of eGFR decline compared with baseline, with earlier disease associated with positive treatment response. Conclusion: Real-world data have revealed a much higher regional variation in tolvaptan prescribing for ADPKD in England than expected. We propose further investigation into the factors responsible for this variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.