Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022

Mapping and Validating a Point Neuron Model on Intel's Neuromorphic Hardware Loihi.

Srijanie Dey, Alexander Dimitrov

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Srijanie DeyDepartment of Mathematics, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Alexander DimitrovDepartment of Mathematics, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphic hardware is based on emulating the natural biological structure of the brain. Since its computational model is similar to standard neural models, it could serve as a computational accelerator for research projects in the field of neuroscience and artificial intelligence, including biomedical applications. However, in order to exploit this new generation of computer chips, we ought to perform rigorous simulation and consequent validation of neuromorphic models against their conventional implementations. In this work, we lay out the numeric groundwork to enable a comparison between neuromorphic and conventional platforms. "Loihi"-Intel's fifth generation neuromorphic chip, which is based on the idea of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) emulating the activity of neurons in the brain, serves as our neuromorphic platform. The work here focuses on Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) models based on neurons in the mouse primary visual cortex and matched to a rich data set of anatomical, physiological and behavioral constraints. Simulations on classical hardware serve as the validation platform for the neuromorphic implementation. We find that Loihi replicates classical simulations very efficiently with high precision. As a by-product, we also investigate Loihi's potential in terms of scalability and performance and find that it scales notably well in terms of run-time performance as the simulated networks become larger.

Indexed as

LIF modelsneural simulationsneuromorphic computingperformance analysisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID36726406
PMCPMC9886005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.