ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022
Mapping and Validating a Point Neuron Model on Intel's Neuromorphic Hardware Loihi.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling macroscopic brain dynamics with brain-inspired computing architecture.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Brain-Inspired Spatio-Temporal Associative Memories for Neuroimaging Data Classification: EEG and fMRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sensitivity analysis of point neuron model simulations implemented on neuromorphic hardware.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromorphic hardware is based on emulating the natural biological structure of the brain. Since its computational model is similar to standard neural models, it could serve as a computational accelerator for research projects in the field of neuroscience and artificial intelligence, including biomedical applications. However, in order to exploit this new generation of computer chips, we ought to perform rigorous simulation and consequent validation of neuromorphic models against their conventional implementations. In this work, we lay out the numeric groundwork to enable a comparison between neuromorphic and conventional platforms. "Loihi"-Intel's fifth generation neuromorphic chip, which is based on the idea of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) emulating the activity of neurons in the brain, serves as our neuromorphic platform. The work here focuses on Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) models based on neurons in the mouse primary visual cortex and matched to a rich data set of anatomical, physiological and behavioral constraints. Simulations on classical hardware serve as the validation platform for the neuromorphic implementation. We find that Loihi replicates classical simulations very efficiently with high precision. As a by-product, we also investigate Loihi's potential in terms of scalability and performance and find that it scales notably well in terms of run-time performance as the simulated networks become larger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.