Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726399›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2023

Surgical Management of Recurrence of Primary Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones.

HongTian Xia, HangYu Zhang, XianLei Xin, Bin Liang, Tao Yang, Yang Liu, Jing Wang, XiangFei Meng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06601387 (Evaluation of Choledochoduodonostomy Vs Hepaticojejunostomy in Patients With Choledocholithiasis Indicated for Shunt .), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06601387 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Choledochoduodonostomy Vs Hepaticojejunostomy in Patients With Choledocholithiasis Indicated for Shunt .

TypeinterventionalSponsorMohamed Ahmed Hassan AlyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsRecurrent Common Bile Duct StonesArmscholedochoduodonostomy, hepaticojejunostomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

HongTian XiaFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3821-5747
HangYu ZhangFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-4073
XianLei XinFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8117-7419
Bin LiangFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2378-9924
Tao YangFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-5583
Yang LiuFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-4562
Jing WangFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-7263
XiangFei MengFaculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-7316
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The surgical treatment of primary intrahepatic bile duct stones is associated with high rates of postoperative complications, stone recurrence, and reoperation. This study aimed to report an 11-year experience in the management of postoperative recurrence of intrahepatic bile duct stones, analyze the causes of the reoperation, and establish appropriate surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: The records of 148 patients with postoperative recurrence of primary intrahepatic bile duct stones treated from January 2005 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior surgical treatment and postoperative data were analyzed to investigate possible causes of recurrence and reoperation. Results: All patients with a prior cholangiojejunostomy ( Conclusions: The pathogenesis of primary intrahepatic bile duct stones is associated with biliary infection and intrahepatic bile duct cholestasis. According to the etiology and pathogenic mechanism, surgical procedures that improve long-term outcomes and reduce postoperative recurrence include bile duct exploration with stone extraction, partial hepatectomy, hilar ductoplasty, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholestasisConstriction, PathologicHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36726399
PMCPMC9886471
OpenAlexW4317796355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.