Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726216›Full record

ArticleBJU international2023

Patient experience of follow-up after surgery for kidney cancer: a focus group study.

Hannah Harrison, Grant D Stewart, Juliet A Usher-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah HarrisonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-852X
Grant D StewartDepartment of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-9140
Juliet A Usher-SmithDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-2531

Funding

Cancer Research UK ACEDFR3_0620I135PR007Cancer Research UK C9685/A25177Department of Health NIHR300861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore patient experience of follow-up care after kidney cancer surgery and to develop recommendations for best practice.

methodsWe conducted two focus groups, including 14 participants with experience of kidney cancer follow-up after surgery, to elicit patient views on current follow-up care. Thematic analysis was used to identify unifying themes to describe the patient experience of follow-up, and the results were then used to develop a set of recommendations for best practice.

resultsWe identified six themes (feelings of abandonment; uncertainty about the plan; anxiety about appointments; variation in care; a need for information; and a need for emotional support) that described current patient experience and areas in which current care could be improved. In particular, while most of the participants felt that their physical needs had been met, many had struggled with unmet emotional needs and a lack of information and resources. This was especially noted in the period immediately following surgery, when feelings of abandonment were common, and around follow-up scans and routine appointments, which were a source of anxiety. Our participants also described concerns about the lack of consistency between different hospitals and centres around the United Kingdom, with differences in the content and quality of follow-up care. Based on the results, we developed a list of recommendations to address some of the challenges described through relatively minor changes to the care pathway.

conclusionsWe identified gaps and variability in current follow-up care after kidney cancer surgery, and have developed a set of recommendations that, if implemented, would improve the follow-up care experience for these patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient Outcome Assessmentfocus group studyfollow-up#kcsmkidney cancer#KidneyCancerpatient experiencesurveillance#uroonc

Identifiers

PMID36726216
PMCPMC10952230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.