Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726178›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2023

Switching to brolucizumab: injection intervals and visual, anatomical and safety outcomes at 12 and 18 months in real-world eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Joseph M Coney, Ryan Zubricky, Samriddhi Buxy Sinha, Nina Sonbolian, Lujia Zhou, Thomas P Hull, Shawn A Lewis, David G Miller, Michael A Novak, Scott D Pendergast and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. VEGF-inhibitor switch trial in poor-responsive neovascular age-related macular degeneration: assessing brolucizumab vs. faricimab: VISTA study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph M ConeyRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA. jconey@retina-assoc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-2637
Ryan ZubrickyGeisinger Eye Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Samriddhi Buxy SinhaNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nina SonbolianNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Lujia ZhouKMK Consulting, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Thomas P HullRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Shawn A LewisRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
David G MillerRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Michael A NovakRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Scott D PendergastRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Hang PhamRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Sean M PlattRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Llewelyn J RaoRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Jerome P SchartmanRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Lawrence J SingermanRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Richard DonkorRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Margaret FinkRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Jasmyne McCoyRetina Associates of Cleveland Inc, 24075 Commerce Park, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA.
Helene KarcherNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Retina Associates · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHGeisinger Neuroscience Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection interval influences treatment burden and compliance in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This real-world study investigates visual acuity (VA), injection-interval extension, central macular thickness (CMT) and safety in nAMD eyes switched to the anti-VEGF agent brolucizumab and followed for up to 18 months.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients with nAMD who were switched from other anti-VEGF agents to brolucizumab only. Patient eyes were grouped into three nested cohorts with the overall cohort receiving ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection, the second receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 12 months and the third cohort receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 18 months. Study endpoints included changes from baseline at 12 or 18 months in VA, injection intervals, and CMT. Sub-group analyses were conducted using baseline injection interval length or baseline VA as qualifiers.

resultsOverall, 482 eyes received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection; 174 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 12 months of follow-up, and 95 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 18 months of follow-up. VA (mean [95% confidence intervals]) remained stable relative to baseline after 12 months (- 1.1 [- 3.7, 1.6] letters; p = 0.42) and 18 months (0.0 [- 3.1, 3.1] letters; p = 0.98) of brolucizumab treatment, respectively, and pre-switch injection intervals or baseline VA had no notable effect. Following the switch to brolucizumab, injection intervals were extended from baseline to month 12 by 26.9 (19.7, 34.0) days (p < 0.0001), and eyes with pre-switch injection intervals < 8 weeks were able to have their injection intervals extended by 23.6 days longer than eyes with pre-switch injection intervals ≥ 8 weeks. At 18 months, injection intervals were extended by 36.3 (25.6, 46.9) days (p < 0.0001) compared to baseline. Following switch to brolucizumab, CMT was reduced at both 12 and 18 months (12 months: - 35.2 (- 51.7, - 18.8) µm, p < 0.0001; 18 months: - 38.9 (- 54.3, - 22.0) µm, p < 0.0001). Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were reported in 4.6% of brolucizumab-treated eyes.

conclusionsThis real-world study demonstrates that injection intervals may be significantly extended with maintained vision and reduced CMT in nAMD eyes switching to brolucizumab therapy from other anti-VEGFs.

Indexed as

Anti-VEGFBeovuBrolucizumabInjection intervalsnAMDNeovascular age-related macular degenerationSwitch patientsTreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID36726178
PMCPMC9891747
OpenAlexW4318913856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.