Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726129›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Integrative single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq analysis of myogenic differentiation in pig.

Shufang Cai, Bin Hu, Xiaoyu Wang, Tongni Liu, Zhuhu Lin, Xian Tong, Rong Xu, Meilin Chen, Tianqi Duo, Qi Zhu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shufang Cai *State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Bin Hu *Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoyu Wang *State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Tongni Liu *Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Zhuhu LinState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Xian TongState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Rong XuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Meilin ChenState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Tianqi DuoState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Qi ZhuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Ziyun LiangState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Enru LiState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Yaosheng ChenState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Jianhao LiGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong, China. jianhao63@sina.com.
Xiaohong LiuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. liuxh8@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Delin MoState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. modelin@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-4486
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CASR-35Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019B1515210013National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772565National Natural Science Foundation of China 32072697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle development is a multistep process whose understanding is central in a broad range of fields and applications, from the potential medical value to human society, to its economic value associated with improvement of agricultural animals. Skeletal muscle initiates in the somites, with muscle precursor cells generated in the dermomyotome and dermomyotome-derived myotome before muscle differentiation ensues, a developmentally regulated process that is well characterized in model organisms. However, the regulation of skeletal muscle ontogeny during embryonic development remains poorly defined in farm animals, for instance in pig. Here, we profiled gene expression and chromatin accessibility in developing pig somites and myotomes at single-cell resolution.

resultsWe identified myogenic cells and other cell types and constructed a differentiation trajectory of pig skeletal muscle ontogeny. Along this trajectory, the dynamic changes in gene expression and chromatin accessibility coincided with the activities of distinct cell type-specific transcription factors. Some novel genes upregulated along the differentiation trajectory showed higher expression levels in muscular dystrophy mice than that in healthy mice, suggesting their involvement in myogenesis. Integrative analysis of chromatin accessibility, gene expression data, and in vitro experiments identified EGR1 and RHOB as critical regulators of pig embryonic myogenesis.

conclusionsCollectively, our results enhance our understanding of the molecular and cellular dynamics in pig embryonic myogenesis and offer a high-quality resource for the further study of pig skeletal muscle development and human muscle disease.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisAnimalsCell DifferentiationChromatinGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalSingle-Cell AnalysisSwineChromatinMyogenic differentiationPigscATAC-seqscRNA-seqSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID36726129
PMCPMC9893630
OpenAlexW4318763903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.