Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726120›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2023

Japan should initiate the discussion on voluntary assisted dying legislation now.

Atsushi Asai, Taketoshi Okita, Yoko Shimakura, Masashi Tanaka, Miki Fukuyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atsushi AsaiDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. aasai@med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-1452
Taketoshi OkitaDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-6451
Yoko ShimakuraDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Masashi TanakaDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Miki FukuyamaCourse of Nursing, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo laws or official guidelines govern voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Japan. A legislative bill on the termination of life-sustaining measures has yet to be sent to deliberations for legislation, due to strong opposition that has prevented it from being submitted to the Diet. However, Japan has recently witnessed several cases involving VAD. MAIN TEXT: Against this backdrop, we argue that Japan should begin discussion on VAD legislation, referring to the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (VADA2017), which was established in 2017 in Victoria, Australia. VADA2017 puts in place a wide range of stringent safeguards and is considered worldwide to be the safest and most conservative policy on a physician offering assisted dying based on the patient's premeditated request. We consider what opposing opinions from society would arise in response to the VADA2017. Among these will include arguments against VAD itself, those against the validation of this act, and opinions that oppose even the initiation of the dialogue on VAD.

conclusionsWe conclude that to protect the right to life among those placed in vulnerable positions and, at the same time, to respect decision-making of those who wish for immediate death due to unbearable suffering, the dialogue must immediately begin with that on introducing a policy more conservative than that of the VADA2017, which solidly considers arguments against VAD.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSuicide, AssistedDissent and DisputesHumansJapanVictoriaCultureDiscussionJapanObjectionsSafeguardsVoluntary Assisted Death Act 2017 (Victoria)Voluntary assisted dying (VAD)

Identifiers

PMID36726120
PMCPMC9890417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.