Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726117›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2023

Cost-effectiveness of seven-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule for acute stroke patients.

Yasuhiro Morii, Kagari Abiko, Toshiya Osanai, Jiro Takami, Takumi Tanikawa, Kensuke Fujiwara, Kiyohiro Houkin, Katsuhiko Ogasawara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhiro MoriiCenter for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
Kagari AbikoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sapporo Azabu Neurosurgical Hospital, N22-E1, Higashi-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toshiya OsanaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Jiro TakamiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Nishi Sapporo Hospital, 5-1, Yamanote 3-2, Nishi-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takumi TanikawaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kensuke FujiwaraFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kiyohiro HoukinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsuhiko OgasawaraFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. oga@hs.hokudai.ac.jp.
Hokkaido University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPSapporo National Hospital · JPSapporo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation is an essential medical service for patients who have suffered acute stroke. Although the effectiveness of 7-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule has been studied in comparison with 5- or 6-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule, its cost-effectiveness has not been analyzed. In this research, to help formulate more cost-effective medical treatments for acute stroke patients, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of 7-days-per-week rehabilitation for acute stroke from public health payer's perspective, and public healthcare and long-term care payer's perspective in Japan.

methodsCost-effectiveness of 7-days-per-week rehabilitation for acute stroke patients was analyzed based on the result from a previous study using a Japanese database examining the efficacy of 7-days-per-week rehabilitation. Cost utility analysis was conducted by comparing 7-days-per-week rehabilitation with 5- or 6-days-per-week rehabilitation, with its main outcome incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated by dividing estimated incremental medical and long-term care costs by incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The costs were estimated using the Japanese fee table and from published sources. The time horizon was 5 years, and Markov modeling was used for the analysis.

resultsThe ICER was $6339/QALY from public health payer's perspective, lower than 5,000,000 Yen/QALY (approximately US$37,913), which was the willingness-to-pay used for the cost-effectiveness evaluation in Japan. The 7-day-per-week rehabilitation was dominant from public healthcare and long-term care payer's perspective. The result of sensitivity analysis confirmed the results.

conclusionThe results indicated that 7-days-per-week rehabilitation for acute stroke rehabilitation was likely to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Acute strokeCost-effectivenessCost utility analysisRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36726117
PMCPMC9893661
OpenAlexW4318763940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.