Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726101›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Factors associated with the uptake of clinical breast examination among women of reproductive age in Lesotho: analysis of a national survey.

Agani Afaya, Timothy Tienbia Laari, Abdul Aziz Seidu, Richard Adongo Afaya, Silas Selorm Daniels-Donkor, Vida Nyagre Yakong, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Agani AfayaMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, South Korea.
Timothy Tienbia LaariPresbyterian Primary Health Care (PPHC), Bolgatanga, Ghana.
Abdul Aziz SeiduCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, Australia. abdul-aziz.seidu@stu.ucc.edu.gh.
Richard Adongo AfayaDepartment of Midwifery and Women's Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Silas Selorm Daniels-DonkorDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Vida Nyagre YakongDepartment of Preventive Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahREMS Consult Ltd, Takoradi, Ghana.
University for Development Studies · GHJames Cook University · AUKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHTakoradi Technical University · GHUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low-resource settings with weak health systems, the WHO recommends clinical breast examination (CBE) as the most cost-effective breast screening modality for women. Evidence shows that biennial CBE leads to significant downstaging of breast cancer in all women. Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women in Lesotho with a weaker healthcare system and a low breast cancer screening rate. This study investigated the prevalence and factors associated with the uptake of CBE among women of reproductive age in Lesotho.

methodsThis study used cross-sectional data from the 2014 Lesotho Demographic and Health Survey. A sample of 6584 reproductive-age women was included in this study. We conducted both descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The study results were presented in frequencies, percentages, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with their corresponding confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe prevalence of CBE uptake was 9.73% (95% CI: 8.91, 10.61). Women who were covered by health insurance (aOR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.37, 3.88]), those who were pregnant (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.64, 3.35]), those who had one to three children (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.29,2.52]), and women who frequently read newspapers or magazines (aOR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.02,1.72]) were more likely to undergo CBE than their counterparts. Women who were aware of breast cancer (aOR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.63,3.97]), those who have ever had breast self-examination (BSE) within the last 12 months prior to the study (aOR = 5.30, 95% CI [4.35,6.46]), and those who visited the health facility in the last 12 months prior to the study (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.27,1.95]) were also more likely to undergo CBE than their counterparts. Women residing in the Qacha's-nek region (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.26,0.67]) were less likely to undergo CBE than those in the Botha-bothe region.

conclusionThe study found a low prevalence of CBE uptake among reproductive-age women in Lesotho. Factors associated with CBE uptake include health insurance coverage, being pregnant, those who had one to three children, exposure to media, breast cancer awareness, ever had BSE, and those who visited a health facility. To increase CBE uptake, these factors should be considered when designing cancer screening interventions and policies in order to help reduce the burden of breast cancer in Lesotho.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreast Self-ExaminationChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLesothoMass ScreeningBreast cancerClinical breast examinationLesothoReproductive women

Identifiers

PMID36726101
PMCPMC9890772
OpenAlexW4318777066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.