Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726068›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Revisiting fertility regulation and family ties in Tunisia.

Olfa Frini, Christophe Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olfa FriniInstitut Supérieur de Comptabilité & d'Administration Des Entreprises, Manouba University, Tunis, Tunisia.
Christophe MullerAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, AMSE, Marseille, France. christophe.muller@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe revisit fertility regulation in Tunisia by examining the role of the extended family. As marriage is the exclusive acknowledged childbearing context, we examine fertility analysis in Tunisia through the sequence: woman's marriage age, post-marriage delay in the first use of contraception, and past and current contraceptive use. We trace the family socio-economic influences that operate through these decisions.

methodsUsing data from the 2001 PAP-FAM Tunisian survey, we estimate the duration and probability models of these birth control decisions.

resultsIn Tunisia, family ties and socio-cultural environment appear to hamper fertility regulation that operates through the above decisions. This is notably the case for couples whose marriages are arranged by the extended family or who benefit from financial support from both parental families.

conclusionThis calls for family planning policies that address more the extended families.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFertilityBirth RateContraception BehaviorDeveloping CountriesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMarriageTunisiaAge at marriageBirth controlContraceptionFamily influenceFertility regulationTunisia

Identifiers

PMID36726068
PMCPMC9890736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.