Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725975›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Disease severity classification using passively collected smartphone-based keystroke dynamics within multiple sclerosis.

Aleide Hoeijmakers, Giovanni Licitra, Kim Meijer, Ka-Hoo Lam, Pam Molenaar, Eva Strijbis, Joep Killestein

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07716033 (Evaluation of the Aesthetic and Functional Properties of A Universal One-Shade Composite Material With Chameleon-like Properties), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07716033 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Aesthetic and Functional Properties of A Universal One-Shade Composite Material With Chameleon-like Properties: A Longitudinal Split-Mouth Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGoa Dental CollegeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsEarly Childhood Caries (ECC)ArmsTokuyama Palfique Omnichroma composite restoration, 3M Filtek Z350 composite restoration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleide HoeijmakersNeurocast B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giovanni LicitraNeurocast B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. giovanni@neurocast.nl.
Kim MeijerNeurocast B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ka-Hoo LamDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pam MolenaarDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva StrijbisDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep KillesteinDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system characterised by a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms. The level of disability of people with MS (pwMS) is based on a wide range of clinical measures, though their frequency of evaluation and inaccuracies coming from objective and self-reported evaluations limits these assessments. Alternatively, remote health monitoring through devices can offer a cost-efficient solution to gather more reliable, objective measures continuously. Measuring smartphone keyboard interactions is a promising tool since typing and, thus, keystroke dynamics are likely influenced by symptoms that pwMS can experience. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate whether keyboard interactions gathered on a person's smartphone can provide insight into the clinical status of pwMS leveraging machine learning techniques. In total, 24 Healthy Controls (HC) and 102 pwMS were followed for one year. Next to continuous data generated via smartphone interactions, clinical outcome measures were collected and used as targets to train four independent multivariate binary classification pipelines in discerning pwMS versus HC and estimating the level of disease severity, manual dexterity and cognitive capabilities. The final models yielded an AUC-ROC in the hold-out set above 0.7, with the highest performance obtained in estimating the level of fine motor skills (AUC-ROC=0.753). These findings show that keyboard interactions combined with machine learning techniques can be used as an unobtrusive monitoring tool to estimate various levels of clinical disability in pwMS from daily activities and with a high frequency of sampling without increasing patient burden.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisDisability EvaluationHumansPatient AcuitySelf ReportSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36725975
PMCPMC9892592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.