ArticlePain and therapy2023
Systemically Acting Diclofenac Sodium Patch for Control of Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Japan.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain managementPooled it
- Investigation of the effects of a new transdermal formulation of systemic diclofenac on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa in patients with low back pain: A comparative study with oral diclofenac.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and Predictive Factors of Systemically Acting Diclofenac Sodium Patch for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Management of Cancer Pain: Advances in Treatment Strategies and Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Effect of Fluid Paraffin on the Formulation Properties of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Formulations Containing Diclofenac Sodium.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Article
- Combined Efficacy of Systemically Acting Diclofenac Sodium Patch and Alpha-2-Delta Calcium Channel Ligand in Chronic Low Back Pain: Subanalysis of a Phase III Study.Pain and therapy · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Switching from Prior Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs to Transdermal Diclofenac in Cancer Pain Management.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders such as low back pain and exist in multiple formulations; however, no systemically acting transdermal formulations are available for low back pain. Transdermal formulations can be safely administered even to patients with trouble swallowing or at risk of aspiration, and without regard to the effect of food on drug absorption. Unlike locally acting formulations, systemically acting transdermal formulations need not be applied at the target site, so dosing is simple and the burden is not on one area of the skin. A patch with the systemically acting NSAID diclofenac sodium is approved in Japan for treatment of cancer-related pain, and we hypothesized that it would be useful for controlling low back pain.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diclofenac sodium patch in Japanese patients with low back pain. Eligible patients were randomized to receive diclofenac sodium patch 75 mg or 150 mg or placebo once daily for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was pain intensity assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS).
resultsPrimary analysis of the primary endpoint showed that both doses of the diclofenac sodium patch (150 mg and 75 mg) were superior to placebo in terms of absolute change from baseline in mean 3-day VAS score after 2 weeks' treatment; the mean difference between the active and placebo treatments in this variable was -5.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) -9.34 to -2.00] mm in the 150 mg group and -5.68 (95% CI -9.34 to -2.01) mm in the 75 mg group. Most adverse events were mild. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionIn Japanese patients, diclofenac sodium patch is effective for the relief of low back pain and is well tolerated.
trial registrationJPRN number, JPRN-JapicCTI-205134.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.