Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725778›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2023

The Long Outer-Hair-Cell RC Time Constant: A Feature, Not a Bug, of the Mammalian Cochlea.

Alessandro Altoè, Christopher A Shera

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural Mechanism of Prestin-Membrane Mechanotransduction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. How Exceptional Is the Ear?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  4. Frontiers in audiology and otology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro AltoèCaruso Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. altoe@usc.edu.
Christopher A SheraCaruso Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. christopher.shera@usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5939-2710
University of Southern California · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONSR01DC003687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher A Shera · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Nonlinear wave interactions in the cochlea and their application to sound processingR21DC019712 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ALTOE, ALESSANDRO · 2022 to 2024
$619k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003687NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea of the mammalian inner ear includes an active, hydromechanical amplifier thought to arise via the piezoelectric action of the outer hair cells (OHCs). A classic problem of cochlear biophysics is that the RC (resistance-capacitance) time constant of the hair-cell membrane appears inconveniently long, producing an effective cut-off frequency much lower than that of most audible sounds. The long RC time constant implies that the OHC receptor potential-and hence its electromotile response-decreases by roughly two orders of magnitude over the frequency range of mammalian hearing, casting doubt on the hypothesized role of cycle-by-cycle OHC-based amplification in mammalian hearing. Here, we review published data and basic physics to show that the "RC problem" has been magnified by viewing it through the wrong lens. Our analysis finds no appreciable mismatch between the expected magnitude of high-frequency electromotility and the sound-evoked displacements of the organ of Corti. Rather than precluding significant OHC-based boosts to auditory sensitivity, the long RC time constant appears beneficial for hearing, reducing the effects of internal noise and distortion while increasing the fidelity of cochlear amplification.

Indexed as

CochleaHair Cells, Auditory, OuterAnimalsHearingMammalsSoundAmplificationDistortionNoiseOuter hair cellRC time constant

Identifiers

PMID36725778
PMCPMC10121995
OpenAlexW4318924600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.