SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023
Current advances in the surgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of microvascular decompression vs neurotomy for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a multicenter clinimetric study.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Case Report: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia secondary to syncope: insights into microvascular decompression treatment.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The intrinsic reason why it is relevant to introduce the concept of "small fiber neuralgia" into the taxonomy of pain disorders.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Case Report: Isolated lingual pain: a rare and atypical presentation of trigeminal neuralgia successfully treated with microvascular decompression.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes after microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Neurosurgical focus · 2025Article
- Internal Neurolysis for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia without Vascular Compression: Report of 2 Cases.NMC case report journal · 2025Article
- Pediatric glossopharyngeal neuralgia with incidental trigeminal compression treated using microvascular decompression: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Diagnostic and treatment pitfalls in glossopharyngeal neuralgia: evidence from a case series.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic glossopharyngeal neuralgia: A systematic review.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Review
- The efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a neurological condition characterized by paroxysmal, stabbing-like pain along the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve that lasts from a couple of seconds to minutes. Pharmacological treatment with anticonvulsants is the first line of treatment; however, about 25% of patients remain symptomatic and require surgical intervention, which is usually done via microvascular decompression (MVD) with or without rhizotomy. More recently, the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been utilized as an alternative treatment method to relieve patient symptoms by causing nerve ablation. We conducted a systematic review to analyze whether MVD without rhizotomy is an equally effective treatment for GPN as MVD with the use of concurrent rhizotomy. Moreover, we sought to explore if SRS, a minimally invasive alternative surgical option, achieves comparable outcomes. We included retrospective studies and case reports in our search. We consulted PubMed and Medline, including articles from the year 2000 onwards. A total of 36 articles were included for review. Of all included patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia, the most common offending artery compressing the glossopharyngeal nerve was the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). MVD alone was successful achieving pain relief immediately postoperatively in about 85% of patients, and also long term in 65-90% of patients. The most common complication found on MVD surgery was found to be transient hoarseness and transient dysphagia. Rhizotomy alone shows an instant pain relief in 85-100% of the patients, but rate of long-term pain relief was lower compared to MVD. The most common adverse effects observed after a rhizotomy were dysphagia and dysesthesia along the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve. SRS had promising results in pain reduction when using 75 Gy radiation or higher; however, long-term rates of pain relief were lower. MVD, rhizotomy, and SRS are effective methods to treat GPN as they help achieve instant pain relief and the decrease use of medication. Patients with MVD alone presented with less adverse effects than the group that underwent MVD plus rhizotomy. Although SRS may be a viable alternative treatment for GPN, further studies must be done to evaluate long-term treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.