ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2024
[Development of an app to support in-home care consultation visits].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe in-home care consultation visits according to § 37.3 of the Social Security Statute Book XI have been carried out inconsistently so far and with a lack of structured care documentation. In the INGE-integrate4care project, an app was developed to support the quality assurance of visits.
methodBased on a user-centered design approach, 10 semistructured expert interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. In group-based expert walkthroughs with 7 participants, the design, contents and functions of the app were discussed, requirements were collected in feedback lists and digitally implemented by developers.
resultsInterviewees reported that visits are heterogeneous, that there are individual approaches and that this should be reflected in the design of the app. Important topics for the app were, e.g. contents of the NBA and the burden on caregivers. Functions such as the recommendation of measures on the basis of documented information are desirable. On the other hand, too stringent guidelines of the app would be an obstacle, as these would limit the conversational character of the visit. The NBA and BIZA‑D were chosen by the experts in the project as suitable basic assessments and adapted to the visits. Flexible access to items, visualization of care status per category, and the ability to select and track measures were specified to support workflow. DISCUSSION: The user-centered design approach enabled the development of an app that is characterized by both flexibility and structure. The tool will be further optimized with the help of usability evaluations and focus groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.