ArticleSkeletal radiology2023
Does the apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MRI imaging aid in the characterization of malignant soft tissue tumors and sarcomas.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for treatment response assessment in soft tissue sarcoma: Reproducibility and prognostic value of whole-tumor and sub-regional analysis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumor with sarcomatous transformation during recurrence.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- MRI findings for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue tumors: a narrative review- Part 1: diagnostic performance.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Musculoskeletal System: Evolving Role in Modern Imaging Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiparametric assessment of high-grade pediatric soft-tissue sarcomas with anatomic and functional MRI sequences: a retrospective study.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Intravoxel incoherent motion combined with conventional MRI for the differentiation of benign, intermediate, and malignant fibrous soft-tissue tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comparing Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI to Conventional Imaging: Staging Pediatric Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- A practical risk stratification system based on ultrasonography and clinical characteristics for predicting the malignancy of soft tissue masses.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify trends in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with respect to tumor type classification and other tumor characteristics whether common malignant soft tissue tumors can be distinguished. MATERIALS AND
methodsA consecutive series of extremity malignant soft tissue tumors and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) among 78 adult patients with conventional MRI and DWI were included. Each case was evaluated with respect to T1/T2 signal alterations and heterogeneity, presence of peritumoral edema, necrosis, cystic changes, internal hemorrhage, and maximum longitudinal dimension blinded to the histology. The ADC mean and minimum were obtained using a free-hand region of interest of the whole tumor and the darkest (lowest signal area) ADC area of the tumor. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Tests were used to determine associations and significance between tumor subtypes. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and kappa calculations were utilized to assess inter-reader agreements for ADC values and reader diagnosis.
resultsLiposarcomas showed more heterogenous T1W images with hyperintense T1W signal when compared to tumors not classified as liposarcoma (P = 0.046 and P = 0.010, respectively). Liposarcomas were relatively consistent in demonstrating an absence of hemorrhage (81.8%) while undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas consistently showed intralesional hemorrhage (90%). When comparing individual tumor classifications against the rest of the samples, lymphomas registered lower mean and minimum ADC values in the whole tumor and in the most hypointense area of the tumor for both readers (P < 0.05). The interobserver agreement between the two readers was good to excellent for all four ADC measurements (ICC = 0.65-0.98).
conclusionDiffusion-weighted imaging generated ADC measurements are reproducible but currently offer limited insight in being able to differentiate among different malignant soft tissue tumor and sarcoma histologies. T1W and T2W signal characteristics also offer limited insight in differentiating between soft tissue malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.