Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725658›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2023

Recurrent neural networks for dynamical systems: Applications to ordinary differential equations, collective motion, and hydrological modeling.

K Gajamannage, D I Jayathilake, Y Park, E M Bollt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K GajamannageDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-3787
D I JayathilakeDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-6285
Y ParkDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-4413
E M BolltDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and The Clarkson Center for Complex Systems, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-7592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical methods of solving spatiotemporal dynamical systems include statistical approaches such as autoregressive integrated moving average, which assume linear and stationary relationships between systems' previous outputs. Development and implementation of linear methods are relatively simple, but they often do not capture non-linear relationships in the data. Thus, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are receiving attention from researchers in analyzing and forecasting dynamical systems. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs), derived from feed-forward ANNs, use internal memory to process variable-length sequences of inputs. This allows RNNs to be applicable for finding solutions for a vast variety of problems in spatiotemporal dynamical systems. Thus, in this paper, we utilize RNNs to treat some specific issues associated with dynamical systems. Specifically, we analyze the performance of RNNs applied to three tasks: reconstruction of correct Lorenz solutions for a system with a formulation error, reconstruction of corrupted collective motion trajectories, and forecasting of streamflow time series possessing spikes, representing three fields, namely, ordinary differential equations, collective motion, and hydrological modeling, respectively. We train and test RNNs uniquely in each task to demonstrate the broad applicability of RNNs in the reconstruction and forecasting the dynamics of dynamical systems.

Identifiers

PMID36725658
PMCPMC9822653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.