Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725535›Full record

ArticleJASA express letters2023

How moderation affects remote psychophysical tasks with children.

Liesbeth Gijbels, Adrian Kc Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JASA express letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liesbeth GijbelsUniversity of Washington, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA lgijbels@uw.edu, akclee@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-3749
Adrian Kc LeeUniversity of Washington, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA lgijbels@uw.edu, akclee@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7611-0500

Funding

Auditory Neuroscience Traning ProgramT32DC005361 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Adrian KC Lee, DAVID J PERKEL · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
Biological origins of literacyR21HD092771 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUHL, PATRICIA K, YEATMAN, JASON D · 2018 to 2019
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD092771NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of remote platforms for auditory research necessitates more in-depth evaluation of assessment protocols, especially when working with children. This work investigates the influence of the presence of a moderator on remote audiovisual speech perception studies, by assessing how moderation impacts children's understanding and performance of the psychophysical tasks as well as their attention on these tasks. In sum, moderated and unmoderated methods can reliably assess audiovisual speech perception benefits. However, regardless of similar error patterns between both studies, unmoderated online studies with children are prone to more general attention lapses as suggested by higher overall error rates.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAttentionChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID36725535
PMCPMC12001821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.