Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725101›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway.

Katariina Laine, Aase Devold Pay, Branka M Yli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of fetal presentation on mode of delivery in 26 143 twin pregnancies: A nationwide, population-based observational study of 31-year real-world data.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katariina LaineNorwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway kattiksen@yahoo.no.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-8401
Aase Devold PayDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Branka M YliDepartment of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study caesarean section (CS) rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health in Norway during 1999-2018.

designPopulation-based cohort study.

settingMedical Birth Registry of Norway.

participants1 153 789 births and 1 174 066 newborns.

methodsCS, intrapartum, perinatal and neonatal mortality rates expressed as percentages (%) or per mille (‰) with 95% CIs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: CS rates in the Robson Ten-Group Classification System; intrapartum, perinatal and neonatal mortality rates.

resultsThe overall CS rate increased from 12.9% in 1999 to 16.7% in 2008 (p<0.001), and then reduced to 15.8% in 2018 (p<0.001). The largest reductions were observed in Robson groups 2 and 4. In Robson group 2, the planned CS rate decreased from 9.6% in 2007-2008 to 4.6% in 2017-2018, the intrapartum CS rate decreased from 26.6% in 2007-2008 to 22.3% in 2017-2018. In Robson group 4, the planned CS rate decreased from 16.1% in 2007-2008 to 7.6% in 2017-2018, and the intrapartum CS rate decreased from 7.8% in 2007-2008 to 5.2% in 2017-2018.The intrapartum fetal mortality rate decreased from 0.51 per 1000 (‰) in 1999-2000 to 0.14‰ in 2017-2018. Neonatal mortality decreased from 2.52‰ to 1.58‰.

conclusionsCS rates in Norway increased between 1999 and 2008, followed by a significant reduction between 2008 and 2018. At the same time, fetal and neonatal mortality rates decreased. Norwegian obstetricians and midwives have contributed to maintaining a low CS rate under 17%. These findings indicate that restricting the use of CS is a safe option for perinatal health.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionInfant HealthCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNorwayParturitionPregnancyFetal medicineMaternal medicineOBSTETRICS

Identifiers

PMID36725101
PMCPMC9896176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.