Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36725028›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2023

The influence of information sources on intention changes to receive COVID-19 vaccination: A prospective cohort study in Japan.

Daisuke Hori, Tsukasa Takahashi, Yudai Kaneda, Akihiko Ozaki, Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daisuke HoriOccupational and Aerospace Psychiatry Group, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5832-9923
Tsukasa TakahashiOccupational and Aerospace Psychiatry Group, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-4041
Yudai KanedaSchool of Medicine, Hokkaido University.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-9439
Akihiko OzakiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-9657
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBefore the COVID-19 vaccine became available, many Japanese people were undecided about whether or not to receive them. Their decisions were keys to achieving herd immunity. The impact of the type of information source on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake decision-making process remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between information source usage on COVID-19 and subsequent vaccine uptake status among those who have yet to decide whether to receive vaccines from non-prioritized people for vaccination.

methodsProspective cohort online self-administered surveys were conducted in February 2021 (T1), before the start of the mass vaccination program, and September-October 2021 (T2), when the vaccines were available to all citizens. The survey's target population was registered monitors of an Internet research company. Participants who answered "I want to get vaccinated after waiting to see how it goes." at T1 were eligible for analysis. The outcome variable was the COVID-19 vaccine uptake status in T2, and the predictors were 20 types of information sources, categorized based on people (family members, etc.), institutions (governments, etc.), or media (TV news, etc.). Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression adjusted for possible confounders.

resultsThe 5,139 respondents, mean age and standard deviation was 42.8 ± 12.5, 55.7% female, were eligible for analysis. 85.7% completed vaccination (including reserved/intended people) in T2. In the multivariate logistic analysis, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for vaccine uptake were 1.49 (1.18-1.89) for workplaces/schools, 1.81 (1.33-2.47) for LINE, 0.69 (0.55-0.86) for Internet news and 0.62 (0.48-0.82) for video sharing sites.

conclusionsThe type of information source usage played an important role in the decision to vaccinate against COVID-19. Although caution is needed in interpreting the results, obtaining information from workplaces/schools and LINE was influential in promoting immunization.

Indexed as

COVID-19Information SourcesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansIntentionJapanMaleProspective StudiesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCohort studiesCommunication mediaJapanSARS-CoV-2Vaccination hesitancyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36725028
PMCPMC9922561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.