Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36724739›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2023

Medical or Common Knowledge? Knowledge of Medical Professionals on Obesity Diagnosis Criteria and Treatment.

Aleksandra Mojkowska, Krzysztof Sobczak, Katarzyna Leoniuk, Michał Henzler, Marek Jackowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra MojkowskaDepartment of General, Gastroenterological, and Oncological Surgery Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Krzysztof SobczakDepartment of Sociology of Medicine and Social Pathology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Katarzyna LeoniukDepartment of Sociology of Medicine and Social Pathology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Michał HenzlerDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek JackowskiDepartment of General, Gastroenterological, and Oncological Surgery Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProper diagnosis of obesity, its severity, and complications and their effective treatment requires an interdisciplinary healthcare approach. Nevertheless, obesity remains under-identified and undertreated. Academic knowledge concerning obesity pathology, diagnosis, and treatment is advancing. It is not clear whether this translates into clinical practice. The goal of the study was to assess the knowledge of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on obesity and particularly on the criteria for diagnosis as well as for conservative and surgical treatment.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among active HCPs (N = 184), including physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, and paramedics who had contact with adult patients with obesity. The proprietary research survey, implemented in an online tool, was used to assess knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of obesity and self-assessment of that knowledge. The analysis was limited to the following: body mass index (BMI) definition, BMI values, visceral obesity definition, bariatric surgery indications, choice of treatment method, role of diet and physical activity, knowledge of obesity pharmacotherapy, length of obesity pharmacotherapy, financing of bariatric procedures, and goals of bariatric treatment. The correct answers were determined according to the Polish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of obesity.

resultsHalf of the respondents (52.2%) were doctors, 20.7% were nurses and midwives, 19.0% were physiotherapists, and 8.2% were other medical professionals. Among questions related to knowledge on obesity, 67.1% of respondents provided correct answers, with respondents answering questions concerning obesity diagnosis correctly more frequently (70.1%) than those concerning methods of treatment (64.6%). The largest number of correct answers was related to the definition of BMI and normal BMI values. The smallest number of correct answers pertained to the diagnostic criteria for visceral obesity and pharmacological treatment of obesity. There was no statistically significant impact of a responder's knowledge levels on the obesity of different HCPs. Workplace and participation in training sessions were found to have the largest impact on the level of knowledge on obesity. HCPs' own assessment of their knowledge on obesity was negatively correlated with their actual level of knowledge.

conclusionThe prevalence of overweight and obesity implies that essentially every HCP has daily contact with patients with excessive body weight. Knowledge of BMI values cannot be considered as exclusively medical knowledge: these values were established years ago and are present in widely available sources. Our research showed that 32.9% of HCPs did not have sufficient knowledge about how to diagnose and treat obesity.

Indexed as

Obesity, AbdominalPhysical TherapistsAdultBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesHumansObesityBariatric surgeryKnowledgeObesityTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36724739
PMCPMC10331151
OpenAlexW4318769513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.