Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36724177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Age at cancer diagnosis by breed, weight, sex, and cancer type in a cohort of more than 3,000 dogs: Determining the optimal age to initiate cancer screening in canine patients.

Jill M Rafalko, Kristina M Kruglyak, Angela L McCleary-Wheeler, Vidit Goyal, Ashley Phelps-Dunn, Lilian K Wong, Chelsea D Warren, Gina Brandstetter, Michelle C Rosentel, Lauren DiMarzio and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Harmonized nonhuman cancer database.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jill M RafalkoMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-9781
Kristina M KruglyakInformation Technology & Bioinformatics, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Angela L McCleary-WheelerResearch & Development, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Vidit GoyalInformation Technology & Bioinformatics, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ashley Phelps-DunnMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Lilian K WongMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Chelsea D WarrenMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Gina BrandstetterMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Michelle C RosentelMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Lauren DiMarzioMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Lisa M McLennanClinical Studies, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Allison L O'KellMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Todd A CohenMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Daniel S GrosuChief Executive Officer, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-1545
Jason ChibukMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1903-8829
Dana W Y TsuiResearch & Development, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ilya ChornyInformation Technology & Bioinformatics, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Andi FloryMedical & Clinical Affairs, PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of cancer screening is to detect disease at an early stage when treatment may be more effective. Cancer screening in dogs has relied upon annual physical examinations and routine laboratory tests, which are largely inadequate for detecting preclinical disease. With the introduction of non-invasive liquid biopsy cancer detection methods, the discussion is shifting from how to screen dogs for cancer to when to screen dogs for cancer. To address this question, we analyzed data from 3,452 cancer-diagnosed dogs to determine the age at which dogs of certain breeds and weights are typically diagnosed with cancer. In our study population, the median age at cancer diagnosis was 8.8 years, with males diagnosed at younger ages than females, and neutered dogs diagnosed at significantly later ages than intact dogs. Overall, weight was inversely correlated with age at cancer diagnosis, and purebred dogs were diagnosed at significantly younger ages than mixed-breed dogs. For breeds represented by ≥10 dogs, a breed-based median age at diagnosis was calculated. A weight-based linear regression model was developed to predict the median age at diagnosis for breeds represented by ≤10 dogs and for mixed-breed dogs. Our findings, combined with findings from previous studies which established a long duration of the preclinical phase of cancer development in dogs, suggest that it might be reasonable to consider annual cancer screening starting 2 years prior to the median age at cancer diagnosis for dogs of similar breed or weight. This logic would support a general recommendation to start cancer screening for all dogs at the age of 7, and as early as age 4 for breeds with a lower median age at cancer diagnosis, in order to increase the likelihood of early detection and treatment.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesNeoplasmsAnimalsDogsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleRecords

Identifiers

PMID36724177
PMCPMC9891508
OpenAlexW4318754985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.