Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36724082›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2023

Just enough fruit: understanding feedback mechanisms during sexual reproductive development.

Avi Sadka, Catriona H Walker, Dor Haim, Tom Bennett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Flowering Newsletter 2023.Journal of experimental botany · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avi SadkaDepartment of Fruit Tree Sciences, Institute of Plant Sciences, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon Le'Zion 7528809, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-2124
Catriona H WalkerSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-4348
Dor HaimDepartment of Fruit Tree Sciences, Institute of Plant Sciences, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon Le'Zion 7528809, Israel.
Tom BennettSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-4019

Funding

BBSRC BB/X001423/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit and seed produced by a small number of crop plants provide the majority of food eaten across the world. Given the growing global population, there is a pressing need to increase yields of these crops without using more land or more chemical inputs. Many of these crops display prominent 'fruit-flowering feedbacks', in which fruit produced early in sexual reproductive development can inhibit the production of further fruit by a range of mechanisms. Understanding and overcoming these feedbacks thus presents a plausible route to increasing crop yields 'for free'. In this review, we define three key types of fruit-flowering feedback, and examine how frequent they are and their effects on reproduction in a wide range of both wild and cultivated species. We then assess how these phenomenologically distinct phenomena might arise from conserved phytohormonal signalling events, particularly the export of auxin from growing organs. Finally, we offer some thoughts on the evolutionary basis for these self-limiting sexual reproductive patterns, and whether they are also present in the cereal crops that fundamentally underpin global diets.

Indexed as

FruitReproductionCrops, AgriculturalFeedbackSeedsCorrelative inhibitiondominancefloweringfruitplant reproductive development

Identifiers

PMID36724082
PMCPMC10112685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.