Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36724008›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Forensic Psychiatric Outpatients' and Therapists' Perspectives on a Wearable Biocueing App (Sense-IT) as an Addition to Aggression Regulation Therapy: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study.

Janna F Ter Harmsel, Lisanne M Smulders, Matthijs L Noordzij, Lise T A Swinkels, Anna E Goudriaan, Arne Popma, Thimo M van der Pol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janna F Ter HarmselInforsa Forensic Mental Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-9431
Lisanne M SmuldersInforsa Forensic Mental Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-0552
Matthijs L NoordzijDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-9225
Lise T A SwinkelsInforsa Forensic Mental Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-9268
Anna E GoudriaanDepartment of Research and Quality of Care, Arkin Institute for Mental Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-9384
Arne PopmaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-3023
Thimo M van der PolInforsa Forensic Mental Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-7815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the increased use of smart devices and the advantages of individual behavioral monitoring and assessment over time, wearable sensor-based mobile health apps are expected to become an important part of future (forensic) mental health care. For successful implementation in clinical practice, consideration of barriers and facilitators is of utmost importance.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to provide insight into the perspectives of both psychiatric outpatients and therapists in a forensic setting on the use and implementation of the Sense-IT biocueing app in aggression regulation therapy.

methodsA combination of qualitative methods was used. First, we assessed the perspectives of forensic outpatients on the use of the Sense-IT biocueing app using semistructured interviews. Next, 2 focus groups with forensic therapists were conducted to gain a more in-depth understanding of their perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to implementation.

resultsForensic outpatients (n=21) and therapists (n=15) showed a primarily positive attitude toward the addition of the biocueing intervention to therapy, with increased interoceptive and emotional awareness as the most frequently mentioned advantage in both groups. In the semistructured interviews, patients mainly reported barriers related to technical or innovation problems (ie, connection and notification issues, perceived inaccuracy of the feedback, and limitations in the ability to personalize settings). In the focus groups with therapists, 92 facilitator and barrier codes were identified and categorized into technical or innovation level (n=13, 14%), individual therapist level (n=28, 30%), individual patient level (n=33, 36%), and environmental and organizational level (n=18, 20%). The predominant barriers were limitations in usability of the app, patients' motivation, and both therapists' and patients' knowledge and skills. Integration into treatment, expertise within the therapists' team, and provision of time and materials were identified as facilitators.

conclusionsThe chances of successful implementation and continued use of sensor-based mobile health interventions such as the Sense-IT biocueing app can be increased by considering the barriers and facilitators from patients' and therapists' perspectives. Technical or innovation-related barriers such as usability issues should be addressed first. At the therapist level, increasing integration into daily routines and enhancing affinity with the intervention are highly recommended for successful implementation. Future research is expected to be focused on further development and personalization of biocueing interventions considering what works for whom at what time in line with the trend toward personalizing treatment interventions in mental health care.

Indexed as

aggressionbehavior changebiocueingbiofeedbackforensic psychiatryimplementationmHealthmobile healthmobile phonewearable technology

Identifiers

PMID36724008
PMCPMC9932871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.