Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723966›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Repeatability of Quantitative Autofluorescence Imaging in a Multicenter Study Involving Patients With Recessive Stargardt Disease 1.

Patty P A Dhooge, Philipp T Möller, Nils Meland, Katarina Stingl, Camiel J F Boon, Andrew J Lotery, Maurizio Battaglia Parodi, Philipp Herrmann, Wolfgang Klein, Mario G Fsadni and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. ABCA4-associated disease in childhood and adolescence- a phenotype study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Patty P A DhoogeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Philipp T MöllerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nils MelandSMERUD Medical Research International AS, Thunes vei 2, Oslo, Norway.
Katarina StinglUniveristy Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Camiel J F BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew J LoteryFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Maurizio Battaglia ParodiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Philipp HerrmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Wolfgang KleinKatairo GmbH, Kusterdingen, Germany.
Mario G FsadniKatairo GmbH, Kusterdingen, Germany.
Thomas H Wheeler-SchillingCenter for Ophthalmology and Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Soraprazan Consortium
University of Bonn · DESTZ eyetrial · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSmerud Medical Research (Norway) · NOUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the repeatability of quantitative autofluorescence (qAF) in a multicenter setting and evaluates qAF as the end point for clinical trials in recessive Stargardt disease 1 (STGD1). Methods: A total of 102 patients with STGD1 underwent qAF imaging as part of the Stargardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT; EudraCT No. 2018-001496-20). For 166 eyes, we obtained qAF imaging at 2 visits, with 2 recordings per visit. The qAF8 values were independently determined by the study site and a central reading center. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility, as well as interobserver (study site versus reading center) reproducibility were obtained using intraclass correlation (ICC), one-sample t-test, and Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability. Results: The qAF repeatability was ± 26.1% for intra-visit, ± 40.5% for inter-visit, and ± 20.2% for the interobserver reproducibility measures. Intra-visit repeatability was good to excellent for all sites (ICC of 0.88-0.96). Variability between visits was higher with an overall ICC of 0.76 (0.69-0.81). We observed no significant difference in qAF values across sites between visits (7.06 ± 93.33, P = 0.238). Conclusions: Real-life test-retest variability of qAF is higher in this set of data than previously reported in single center settings. With improved operator training and by selecting the better of two recordings for evaluation, qAF serves as a useful method for assessing changes in autofluorescence signal. Translational Relevance: The qAF can be adopted as a clinical trial end point, but steps to counterbalance variability should be considered.

Indexed as

Optical ImagingRetinal Pigment EpitheliumFundus OculiHumansOphthalmoscopyReproducibility of ResultsStargardt Disease

Identifiers

PMID36723966
PMCPMC9904328
OpenAlexW4318754118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.