Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723756›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2023

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology.

Ashley M Snyder, Suephy C Chen, Mary-Margaret Chren, Laura K Ferris, LaVar D Edwards, Robert A Swerlick, Nicholas D Flint, Amy M Cizik, Rachel Hess, Jacob Kean and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Qualitative study of patient-reported outcome data collection among clinicians in dermatology at a single academic center.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ophthalmologic Comorbidities in Alopecia Areata.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashley M SnyderDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 East, 4A330, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-2092
Suephy C ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mary-Margaret ChrenDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-7014
Laura K FerrisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
LaVar D EdwardsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-3932
Robert A SwerlickDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nicholas D FlintDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 East, 4A330, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Amy M CizikDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rachel HessDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-8504
Jacob KeanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA.
Aaron M SecrestDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 East, 4A330, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. aaron.secrest@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-0941
Dermatology PRO Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With more disease- and symptom-specific measures available and research pointing to increased usefulness, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be routinely used in clinical care. PROMs increase efficiency in healthcare, improve the clinician-patient relationship, and increase patient satisfaction with their care. PROMs can be administered before, during, and after clinic visits using paper-and-pencil, mobile phones, tablets, and computers. Herein, we combine available literature with expert views to discuss overcoming barriers and helping dermatologists incorporate PROMs into routine patient-centered care. We believe dermatology patients will benefit from broader PROM implementation and routine clinical use. However, a few major barriers exist: (1) cost to implement the technology, (2) selecting the right PROMs for each disease, and (3) helping both patients and clinicians understand how PROMs add to and complement their current clinical experience. We provide recommendations to assist dermatologists when considering whether to implement PROMs in their practices.

Indexed as

DermatologyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID36723756
PMCPMC9890442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.