ArticleTranslational stroke research2024
Comprehensive CCM3 Mutational Analysis in Two Patients with Syndromic Cerebral Cavernous Malformation.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MEKK3 bridges gut-brain communication and cerebral cavernous malformation pathogenesis.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Pathophysiology, Genetics, Biomarkers, and Treatment Perspectives.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a vascular disease that affects the central nervous system, which familial form is due to autosomal dominant mutations in the genes KRIT1(CCM1), MGC4607(CCM2), and PDCD10(CCM3). Patients affected by the PDCD10 mutations usually have the onset of symptoms at an early age and a more aggressive phenotype. The aim of this study is to investigate the molecular mechanism involved with CCM3 disease pathogenesis. Herein, we report two typical cases of CCM3 phenotype and compare the clinical and neuroradiological findings with five patients with a familial form of KRIT1 or CCM2 mutations and six patients with a sporadic form. In addition, we evaluated the PDCD10 gene expression by qPCR and developed a bioinformatic pipeline to understand the structural changes of mutations. The two CCM3 patients had an early onset of symptoms and a high lesion burden. Furthermore, the sequencing showed that Patient 1 had a frameshift mutation in c.222delT; p.(Asn75Thrfs*14) that leads to lacking the last 124 C-terminal amino acids on its primary structure and Patient 2 had a variant on the splicing site region c.475-2A > G. The mRNA expression was fourfold lower in both patients with PDCD10 mutation. Using in silico analysis, we identify that the frameshift mutation transcript lacks the C-terminal FAT-homology domain compared to the wild-type PDCD10 and preserves the N-terminal dimerization domain. The two patients studied here allow estimating the potential impact of mutations in clinical interpretation as well as support to better understand the mechanism and pathogenesis of CCM3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.