Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723696›Full record

SynthesisCancer metastasis reviews2023

The genetic profile and molecular subtypes of human pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review.

Nora Wangari Murage, Nada Mabrouk Ahmed, Timothy J Underwood, Zoë S Walters, Stella Panagio Breininger

Open access · hybridFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. High prevalence ofPleura and peritoneum · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Laparoscopic cecal pole resection for LAMN a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora Wangari MurageSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Nada Mabrouk AhmedPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Timothy J UnderwoodSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Zoë S WaltersSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Stella Panagio BreiningerSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. s.p.breininger@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-3187
University of Southampton · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare, progressive, slowly growing neoplastic condition which is poorly understood, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate as low as 48%. PMP is most commonly caused by appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN), and understanding their genetic biology and pathogenicity may allow for the development of better novel systemic treatments to target key deleterious mutations and the implicated pathways. The primary aim of this systematic review was to identify the genetic profile of histologically confirmed human PMP or AMN samples. The secondary aim was to identify whether genetic marks could be used to predict patient survival. Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies investigating the genetic profile of histologically-confirmed human PMP or AMN samples. We review findings of 46 studies totalling 2181 tumour samples. The most frequently identified somatic gene mutations in patients with PMP included KRAS (38-100%), GNAS (17-100%), and TP53 (5-23%); however, there were conflicting results of their effect on survival. Three studies identified molecular subtypes based on gene expression profiles classifying patients into oncogene-enriched, immune-enriched, and mixed molecular subtypes with prognostic value. This review summarises the current literature surrounding genetic aberrations in PMP and AMNs and their potential utility for targeted therapy. Given the recent advances in clinical trials to directly target KRAS and GNAS mutations in other cancers, we propose a rationale to explore these mutations in future pre-clinical studies in PMP with a view for a future clinical trial.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPseudomyxoma PeritoneiGenetic ProfileHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Appendiceal mucinous neoplasmsGNASKRASPseudomyxoma peritoneiSomatic gene mutationsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36723696
PMCPMC10014681
OpenAlexW4318754920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read143
identifiers read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.