Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723636›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Non-utilisation of medical services during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with chronic diseases].

Ines Schäfer, Alena Haack, Marie Neumann, Uwe Koch-Gromus, Martin Scherer, Elina Petersen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ines SchäferEpidemiologisches Studienzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 2. OG, Christoph-Probst-Weg 3, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland. ines.schaefer1@uke.de.
Alena HaackEpidemiologisches Studienzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 2. OG, Christoph-Probst-Weg 3, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Marie NeumannEpidemiologisches Studienzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 2. OG, Christoph-Probst-Weg 3, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Uwe Koch-GromusEpidemiologisches Studienzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 2. OG, Christoph-Probst-Weg 3, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Martin SchererInstitut und Poliklinik für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Elina PetersenEpidemiologisches Studienzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 2. OG, Christoph-Probst-Weg 3, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic is also impacting the medical care for other diseases. The extent to which people with chronic diseases are affected by the suspension of medical services is investigated-differentiating between patient and provider perspectives.

methodA cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from the longitudinal Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS). The study population was all HCHS participants (a sample of the population of Hamburg, 45-74 years) between April 2020 and November 2021. Utilisation of medical services was collected via the "COVID-19-module" of the HCHS. The chronic conditions included cardiovascular disease, kidney and lung disease, cancer and diabetes mellitus; analyses were descriptive and multivariate.

resultsOf the 2047 participants, 47.9% had at least one previous illness. Of those with pre-existing conditions, 21.4% had at least one healthcare service suspended or an appointment cancelled. In addition, 15.4% stated that they decided by themselves not to attend a doctor's appointment. Specialist care services (43.8% of all cancellations) were cancelled more frequently than general practitioner care (16.6%). After adjustment for age, gender and education, lung disease (OR 1.80; p < 0.008) and cancer (OR 2.33; p < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for appointment cancellations by healthcare providers. Of cancellations by patients, 42.2% were due to their fear of an infection with the coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2. DISCUSSION: Health policy and the media are faced with the challenge of dealing with fears of infection in the population in such a way that they do not lead to an avoidance of necessary care services.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Chronic diseaseCOVID-19 pandemicHealthcare utilizationPandemic consequencesVulnerable groups

Identifiers

PMID36723636
PMCPMC9891187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.