Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723384›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2023

Predicting microsatellite instability and key biomarkers in colorectal cancer from H&E-stained images: achieving state-of-the-art predictive performance with fewer data using Swin Transformer.

Bangwei Guo, Xingyu Li, Miaomiao Yang, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Hong Zhang, Xu Steven Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bangwei GuoSchool of Data Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China.
Xingyu LiDepartment of Statistics and Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China.
Miaomiao YangClinical Pathology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, PR China.
Jitendra JonnagaddalaSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Statistics and Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China.
Xu Steven XuClinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Science, Genmab Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-5533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many artificial intelligence models have been developed to predict clinically relevant biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), including microsatellite instability (MSI). However, existing deep learning networks require large training datasets, which are often hard to obtain. In this study, based on the latest Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows (Swin Transformer [Swin-T]), we developed an efficient workflow to predict biomarkers in CRC (MSI, hypermutation, chromosomal instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and BRAF and TP53 mutation) that required relatively small datasets. Our Swin-T workflow substantially achieved the state-of-the-art (SOTA) predictive performance in an intra-study cross-validation experiment on the Cancer Genome Atlas colon and rectal cancer dataset (TCGA-CRC-DX). It also demonstrated excellent generalizability in cross-study external validation and delivered a SOTA area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 for MSI, using the Molecular and Cellular Oncology dataset for training (N = 1,065) and the TCGA-CRC-DX (N = 462) for testing. A similar performance (AUROC = 0.91) was reported in a recent study, using ~8,000 training samples (ResNet18) on the same testing dataset. Swin-T was extremely efficient when using small training datasets and exhibited robust predictive performance with 200-500 training samples. Our findings indicate that Swin-T could be 5-10 times more efficient than existing algorithms for MSI prediction based on ResNet18 and ShuffleNet. Furthermore, the Swin-T models demonstrated their capability in accurately predicting MSI and BRAF mutation status, which could exclude and therefore reduce samples before subsequent standard testing in a cascading diagnostic workflow, in turn reducing turnaround time and costs.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersDNA MethylationHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBiomarkersProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafbiomarkerscolorectal cancerdeep learningdigital pathologySwin Transformer

Identifiers

PMID36723384
PMCPMC10073932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.