ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2023
Predicting microsatellite instability and key biomarkers in colorectal cancer from H&E-stained images: achieving state-of-the-art predictive performance with fewer data using Swin Transformer.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Molecular Alterations in Colorectal Cancer Using Routine H&E Whole-Slide Images.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Molecular Biomarker Identification in Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Research progress and challenges of multimodal deep learning models for prognosis of gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- The impact of tissue detection on diagnostic artificial intelligence algorithms in prostate digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal foundation models in colorectal cancer: from prediction to trustworthy clinical insight.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Two decades of artificial intelligence in colon cancer diagnosis and treatment: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2003-2023).Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Exploring Machine Learning Approaches for Decision Support in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Aligning computational pathology with clinical practice for colorectal cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Multimodal analysis of whole slide images in colorectal cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Synergistic H&E and IHC image analysis by AI predicts cancer biomarkers and survival outcomes in colorectal and breast cancer.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing genotype-phenotype correlations in colorectal cancer with deep learning: a multicentre cohort study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning for MSI-H in colorectal cancer whole slide images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Accurate colorectal cancer detection using a random hinge exponential distribution coupled attention network on pathological images.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing gastroenterology and hepatology with artificial intelligence: From precision diagnosis to equitable healthcare through interdisciplinary practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Deep Gaussian process with uncertainty estimation for microsatellite instability and immunotherapy response prediction from histology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Habitat radiomics and deep learning on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for noninvasive assessment of CK19 expression and recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-cancer analysis of histopathologic MSI screening based on digital histology image.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many artificial intelligence models have been developed to predict clinically relevant biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), including microsatellite instability (MSI). However, existing deep learning networks require large training datasets, which are often hard to obtain. In this study, based on the latest Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows (Swin Transformer [Swin-T]), we developed an efficient workflow to predict biomarkers in CRC (MSI, hypermutation, chromosomal instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and BRAF and TP53 mutation) that required relatively small datasets. Our Swin-T workflow substantially achieved the state-of-the-art (SOTA) predictive performance in an intra-study cross-validation experiment on the Cancer Genome Atlas colon and rectal cancer dataset (TCGA-CRC-DX). It also demonstrated excellent generalizability in cross-study external validation and delivered a SOTA area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 for MSI, using the Molecular and Cellular Oncology dataset for training (N = 1,065) and the TCGA-CRC-DX (N = 462) for testing. A similar performance (AUROC = 0.91) was reported in a recent study, using ~8,000 training samples (ResNet18) on the same testing dataset. Swin-T was extremely efficient when using small training datasets and exhibited robust predictive performance with 200-500 training samples. Our findings indicate that Swin-T could be 5-10 times more efficient than existing algorithms for MSI prediction based on ResNet18 and ShuffleNet. Furthermore, the Swin-T models demonstrated their capability in accurately predicting MSI and BRAF mutation status, which could exclude and therefore reduce samples before subsequent standard testing in a cascading diagnostic workflow, in turn reducing turnaround time and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.