ArticleFEBS open bio2023
Game on: immersive virtual laboratory simulation improves student learning outcomes & motivation.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Large-Scale Multispecialty Evaluation of Web-Based Simulation in Medical Microbiology Laboratory Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Nursing experience with pneumonia patients based on visual reality simulation: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Experiential learning through virtual reality by-proxy.Virtual reality · 2025Article
- Implementation of LABSTER virtual lab in immunology for innovative teaching and improved learning in veterinary degree.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of gamified learning interventions is expanding in postsecondary education as a means to improve students' motivation and learning outcomes. Virtual laboratory simulations have been used in science education to supplement students' learning, as well as to increase engagement with course material. Due to COVID-19, many instructors sought to replace or supplement hands-on 'wet-lab' work in an online environment. In this paper, we explored how the use of head-mounted display technology in two laboratory simulations impacts learner motivation and learning outcomes. We used a mixed-methods approach to analyze the experience of 39 undergraduate participants, examining test scores pre- and postsimulation, qualitative feedback, and quantitative experience ratings. The head-mounted display technology was described as easy to use, with eye strain identified as a common occurrence. Participants had increased test scores following the laboratory simulations, with no significant difference between simulation groups. Very positive self-reported measures of motivation and learner engagement were documented. Ninety-one percent of participants agreed that virtual reality laboratory simulation would be a good supplement to regular teaching modalities. Overall, our results suggest that immersive virtual reality laboratory simulations experienced through head-mounted display technology can be used to enhance learning outcomes and increase learner motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.